在非限制性定语从句中,which代替前面整个句子而不具体指某一个东西但His naughty grandson has taken away his glasses,_\without\ which the old man can see nothing .此句子which 便指代glasses 那不久矛盾了吗?

来源：学生作业帮助网编辑：作业帮时间：2024/05/02 12:24:30

$在非限制性定语从句中,which代替前面整个句子而不具体指某一个东西但His naughty grandson has taken away his glasses,_\without\ which the old man can see nothing .此句子which 便指代glasses 那不久矛盾了吗?$

在非限制性定语从句中,which代替前面整个句子而不具体指某一个东西但His naughty grandson has taken away his glasses,_\without\ which the old man can see nothing .此句子which 便指代glasses 那不久矛盾了吗?
在非限制性定语从句中,which代替前面整个句子
而不具体指某一个东西
但His naughty grandson has taken away his glasses,_\without\
which the old man can see nothing .
此句子which 便指代glasses 那不久矛盾了吗?

在非限制性定语从句中,which代替前面整个句子而不具体指某一个东西但His naughty grandson has taken away his glasses,_\without\ which the old man can see nothing .此句子which 便指代glasses 那不久矛盾了吗?
which代替前面整个句子
而不具体指某一个东西
——这只是一个方面,是特例,而修饰先行词才是它的普遍用法,所以此句子which 便指代glasses ,很正常

which不一定就代替整个句子，代替名词或代词比较普遍，但也可代替整个句子

在非限制性定语从句中,which代替前面整个句子 而不具体指某一个东西 但His naughty grandson has taken away his glasses,_\without\ which the old man can see nothing .此句子which 便指代glasses 那不久矛盾了吗?

在非限制性定语从句中,which代替前面整个句子而不具体指某一个东西但His naughty grandson has taken away his glasses,_\without\ which the old man can see nothing .此句子which 便指代glasses 那不久矛盾了吗?