中国教育与西方教育的对比对比得越多越好,还要比较优劣.好的还会家分哦.

中国教育与西方教育的对比对比得越多越好,还要比较优劣.好的还会家分哦.
中国教育与西方教育的对比
对比得越多越好,还要比较优劣.好的还会家分哦.

中国教育与西方教育的对比对比得越多越好,还要比较优劣.好的还会家分哦.
The Significance of Peer Selection
Strategic planning
Comparison and emulation are components critical in institutional strategic planning.Peer comparisons can provide a basis for the rational evaluation of differences and of similarities among institutions,and of identifying relative strengths,weaknesses,and possible opportunities or niches.
Mission statements are often vague or abstract statements about institutional goals and priorities (Lang and Lopers-Sweetman,1991).Comparative analysis can help institutions delineate their own identity in more concrete terms.In this regard,such comparisons can be a helpful antidote to external funding and coordination efforts that,deliberately or inadvertently,blur useful distinctions among institutions within a given jurisdiction.
Strategic planning is about a higher education institution\'s future aspirations and realistic possibilities.Throughout the research literature on strategic planning there are frequent references to environmental scanning (Bryson,1988) for the purpose of identifying opportunities,challenges,and the best fits between what the institution is and what its sponsors,users,or beneficiaries wish it to be.Logically,the environment to be scanned for any given institution could have wide and quite indefinite boundaries,so broad and so uncertain as either to defeat scanning or to render it meaningless.By determining its peers,an institution can give shape to its environmental scanning exercise.The concept of environment becomes extremely complex when strategies involve comparisons among institutions in systems that have deeply different cultural roots,as in the case of institutions in Canada and China.
Just as some mission statements are vague and abstract,others are about aspirations,which may or may not be realistic or practicable (Lang and Lopers-Sweetman,1991).One might think of this means of expressing an institutional strategy as definition by association,whether or not there is a sound basis in fact for the association.The key,then,to an aspirational approach to determining institutional strategy is to confine or direct aspiration to institutions that,on the basis of comparative data,seem to share a given college or university\'s mission generally,but appear to be more successful in achieving it.Aspiration,however,is often a core purpose of comparison between different national systems of higher education.
Alternatively,a given institution could postulate a different role for itself in the future by defining a \'desired institution\' containing targets for factors that are potentially controllable by it in the long term.Those factors might include,for example,total enrolment,graduate snare of total enrolment,a balance between part-time and full-time balance,library size,instructional program mix,and targets for external circumstances that the college or university might try to have changed,and then use a peer selection methodology to identify those institutions most similar to this desired institution.The institutions thus identified become a benchmark or milestone against which that specific institution can measure its progress.